Genwich Life Services LLC "Successfully guiding multi generational families through life stage planning" |
Bigger Mortgages Jeopardize Homeowners’
Retirement Years
Just 10 years ago, Linda Byrne kissed her mortgage goodbye and celebrated her
ownership of the four-bedroom house in which she’d raised a family.
Today, at 65, the retired registered
nurse from Portland, Ore., struggles
to pay $2,300 a month on a new
mortgage, and a bank loan on a line
of credit, which she took out to help
family members in financial trouble.
“I’m just barely able to make ends
meet,” says Byrne, who retired in
December after severe osteoarthritis
got the better of her. She collects a
small pension and Social Security
benefits.
“I’ve had to cut back on some of my medications,” she says as she comforts her 8-
month-old granddaughter, who lives with her. “It’s very hard.”
More boomers and older adults are following in Byrne’s footsteps. Thanks to the
housing bubble that catapulted home values around the nation, millions of people
tapped into the equity in their homes to pay off debt, purchase goods and finance
home renovations, or for other reasons. But what they’re left with, in some cases, is a
mortgage that’s bigger than when they first purchased their home decades ago—and
a retirement that is less than financially secure.
A study released in September by the Center for Retirement Research (CRR) at
Boston College found that about 30 percent of homeowners ages 50 to 62 have
cashed in on the equity in their homes, and they will likely remain saddled with
mortgage debt and face a decline in net worth as they hit retirement.
The study, which examined the effects of the housing bubble on people’s retirement
security, says the net worth of these homeowners who tapped into their home equity
fell by 14 percent between 2001 and 2008 because of a decline in value and
increased debt.
Alicia Munnell, director of the CRR, called the housing bubble “a real threat” to
boomers at a time when they should be shoring up their nest eggs—just before
retirement. “People’s mortgages are much bigger, compared to their income, than
ever before,” Munnell says. “We’re going to have older people entering retirement
with less in the way of net worth than they would’ve had in the absences of the boom
and bust of the housing market.”
Len Raymond, founder and executive director of the Boston-based Homeowner
Options for Massachusetts Elders, a nonprofit advocacy and counseling group, says
he often meets with older people seeking financial assistance because their incomes
can’t keep up with their living expenses.
“People are refinancing their mortgages in their mid-50s to early to mid-60s because
they lose their jobs or because of the loss of a spouse, or [to cope with] runaway
costs. When are they going to retire?” he asks.
“The old axiom—that later in life you retire and get the mortgage out of the way—we’
re going in the opposite direction in the United States.”
An AARP analysis of housing debt among homeowners supports that point. More
than two-thirds of homeowners (71 percent) who were between the ages of 50 and 64
had housing debt in 2004, up from 56 percent in 1989. Of homeowners ages 65 to
74, nearly 40 percent carried mortgage debt in 2004, up from 28 percent in 1989.
And of homeowners age 75 and up, 22 percent carried mortgage debt, an increase
of 13 percent.
The median mortgage debt has also jumped, according to a separate study by the
nonprofit Employee Benefit Research Institute. Adults ages 55 to 64 with housing
debt reported owing $83,000 in 2004, up from $39,500 in 1992. Among those 65 to
74, debt climbed from $22,400 to $51,000. Interestingly, adults 75 and up bucked
that trend: Those with housing debt owed $30,000 in 2004, down from $36,900 in
1992.
Ida Cuprys is carrying a smaller mortgage than in her earlier years. Still, at age 88,
Cuprys chuckles at the idea of paying on a 30-year mortgage for the two-bedroom
condominium she bought 12 years ago just outside Chicago. As a daughter of the
Great Depression, she was taught early on that older adults should pay off their
mortgages before they headed into retirement.
“I didn’t think I’d have a mortgage at this age,” says Cuprys, a grandmother of four.
“You just get in the habit of paying it.”
Although Cuprys has no trouble keeping up with her mortgage payments, Jack
Williams, a bankruptcy professor at Georgia State University and the American
Bankruptcy Institute’s resident scholar, says that people who carry housing debt into
their retirement years often put themselves in financial peril.
“When you defer paying off your home, you still have a pretty hefty mortgage to pay.
But you’re starting on the downside of the income-earning curve,” he says.
“Oftentimes you have to pay that deep into your senior years.”
That’s what worries one Washington woman, now in her mid-60s. The woman, who
asked that her name not be used, and her husband refinanced several years ago to
do major home renovations. But now she wonders if the makeover was worth the
housing debt they’ll shoulder for years.
“The thought of having a mortgage when I retire, and I’m not earning money, makes
me sick,” she says. “My income won’t be able to cover the monthly payment. I’ll have
to take money out of my savings. I don’t like to live that way.”
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Carole Fleck is a senior editor on AARP Bulletin staff.
http://bulletin.aarp.
org/yourmoney/retirement/articles/bigger_mortgages_jeopardize_homeowners_retirement_years.
html
Retirement Years
Just 10 years ago, Linda Byrne kissed her mortgage goodbye and celebrated her
ownership of the four-bedroom house in which she’d raised a family.
Today, at 65, the retired registered
nurse from Portland, Ore., struggles
to pay $2,300 a month on a new
mortgage, and a bank loan on a line
of credit, which she took out to help
family members in financial trouble.
“I’m just barely able to make ends
meet,” says Byrne, who retired in
December after severe osteoarthritis
got the better of her. She collects a
small pension and Social Security
benefits.
“I’ve had to cut back on some of my medications,” she says as she comforts her 8-
month-old granddaughter, who lives with her. “It’s very hard.”
More boomers and older adults are following in Byrne’s footsteps. Thanks to the
housing bubble that catapulted home values around the nation, millions of people
tapped into the equity in their homes to pay off debt, purchase goods and finance
home renovations, or for other reasons. But what they’re left with, in some cases, is a
mortgage that’s bigger than when they first purchased their home decades ago—and
a retirement that is less than financially secure.
A study released in September by the Center for Retirement Research (CRR) at
Boston College found that about 30 percent of homeowners ages 50 to 62 have
cashed in on the equity in their homes, and they will likely remain saddled with
mortgage debt and face a decline in net worth as they hit retirement.
The study, which examined the effects of the housing bubble on people’s retirement
security, says the net worth of these homeowners who tapped into their home equity
fell by 14 percent between 2001 and 2008 because of a decline in value and
increased debt.
Alicia Munnell, director of the CRR, called the housing bubble “a real threat” to
boomers at a time when they should be shoring up their nest eggs—just before
retirement. “People’s mortgages are much bigger, compared to their income, than
ever before,” Munnell says. “We’re going to have older people entering retirement
with less in the way of net worth than they would’ve had in the absences of the boom
and bust of the housing market.”
Len Raymond, founder and executive director of the Boston-based Homeowner
Options for Massachusetts Elders, a nonprofit advocacy and counseling group, says
he often meets with older people seeking financial assistance because their incomes
can’t keep up with their living expenses.
“People are refinancing their mortgages in their mid-50s to early to mid-60s because
they lose their jobs or because of the loss of a spouse, or [to cope with] runaway
costs. When are they going to retire?” he asks.
“The old axiom—that later in life you retire and get the mortgage out of the way—we’
re going in the opposite direction in the United States.”
An AARP analysis of housing debt among homeowners supports that point. More
than two-thirds of homeowners (71 percent) who were between the ages of 50 and 64
had housing debt in 2004, up from 56 percent in 1989. Of homeowners ages 65 to
74, nearly 40 percent carried mortgage debt in 2004, up from 28 percent in 1989.
And of homeowners age 75 and up, 22 percent carried mortgage debt, an increase
of 13 percent.
The median mortgage debt has also jumped, according to a separate study by the
nonprofit Employee Benefit Research Institute. Adults ages 55 to 64 with housing
debt reported owing $83,000 in 2004, up from $39,500 in 1992. Among those 65 to
74, debt climbed from $22,400 to $51,000. Interestingly, adults 75 and up bucked
that trend: Those with housing debt owed $30,000 in 2004, down from $36,900 in
1992.
Ida Cuprys is carrying a smaller mortgage than in her earlier years. Still, at age 88,
Cuprys chuckles at the idea of paying on a 30-year mortgage for the two-bedroom
condominium she bought 12 years ago just outside Chicago. As a daughter of the
Great Depression, she was taught early on that older adults should pay off their
mortgages before they headed into retirement.
“I didn’t think I’d have a mortgage at this age,” says Cuprys, a grandmother of four.
“You just get in the habit of paying it.”
Although Cuprys has no trouble keeping up with her mortgage payments, Jack
Williams, a bankruptcy professor at Georgia State University and the American
Bankruptcy Institute’s resident scholar, says that people who carry housing debt into
their retirement years often put themselves in financial peril.
“When you defer paying off your home, you still have a pretty hefty mortgage to pay.
But you’re starting on the downside of the income-earning curve,” he says.
“Oftentimes you have to pay that deep into your senior years.”
That’s what worries one Washington woman, now in her mid-60s. The woman, who
asked that her name not be used, and her husband refinanced several years ago to
do major home renovations. But now she wonders if the makeover was worth the
housing debt they’ll shoulder for years.
“The thought of having a mortgage when I retire, and I’m not earning money, makes
me sick,” she says. “My income won’t be able to cover the monthly payment. I’ll have
to take money out of my savings. I don’t like to live that way.”
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Carole Fleck is a senior editor on AARP Bulletin staff.
http://bulletin.aarp.
org/yourmoney/retirement/articles/bigger_mortgages_jeopardize_homeowners_retirement_years.
html
